Kanyon
Commentary
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
ANOTHER NEGATIVE PWTORCH ARTICLE (WHY ALL THE HATE?)Yet another "journalist" from the Pro Wrestling Torch people wrote a negative article on me. After I requested it, he E-mailed it to me. Here is what he wrote in italic and my response in bold. As I did with the last Torch "journalist," I invite this one to respond as I did, paragraph for paragraph, to what I have written here. The last one refused to respond, I guess because when confronted with facts, maybe writing is not as fun for these guys. The last one would not even print my response on the website. I had to go above his head to editor and I believe owner, Wade Keller, who, in his defense, did immediately put my response up on his website. We will see if this "reporter" is any braver. So here it is:
TORCH #901: MITCHELLS MEMO By Bruce Mitchell, Torch columnist
What exactly is your problem with my announcement? What exactly is your problem with me? As a "reporter," do you feel any obligation to be impartial or to be accurate in reporting facts? From reading your column, I have to assume the answer to both these questions is a resounding, "No." To downplay my 14-year career and my accomplishments definitely shows you are not a fan of mine or of my work. Many people do remember, miss, and appreciate Mortis, and although the character only lasted about 8 months and wrestled about 8 years ago, even you remember it. The amount of fan mail and the amount of fans that approach me to this day about Mortis makes me very proud of what Mortis was. My catch phrase is a very memorable one and has definitely stood the test of time. And many people feel the "Positively Kanyon" aspect of my career was some of the most creative and entertaining aspects of the Nitro era following the arrival of Russo. And to downplay any of the mid-carders who worked so hard during our year and a half plus winning streak over the WWF is not seeing the big picture and definitely not giving some credit where credit is due.
To make the comments about my press release without reading it in its entirety is the very definition of poor journalism. To report that it was 12 pages when it was only 1 1/2 is absurd. At least you were honest enough to report that you were not bright enough to understand my press release ("Okay, I confess, I got lost midway through the first page"), although virtually no one of the 30,000 blog views on my Myspace (www.myspace.com/ChrisKanyon) wrote back to me saying that they were confused. But you, the one of 30,000 that was confused, you feel obligated to report on something you don't understand. You mention your colleague, Caldwell, who also wrote an article on me, but when I took it apart, paragraph for paragraph and called him out on his inaccuracies and insinuations, he refused to answer my questions and comments. You talk of my "17" page response to him although again, you admit you did not read it. Maybe if you did read my blogs in their entirety you wouldn't be so confused and you wouldn't write such ill informed and inaccurate articles. Oh, and in case you are concerned with actual facts, the response to Caldwell's article without copying Caldwell's comments is only 2 1/2 pages, not 17 pages, but when trying to bury someone, who cares about actual facts.
("Anyone who read.") now knows that the character Chris
Kanyon, as opposed to the sports entertainer playing the character Chris
Kanyon who also goes by the name Chris Kanyon, has always been homosexual
only no one knew it and now we do.
At least you again mention the ease with which you get confused. So here is the opening lines of the original press release. I wonder if everyone who reads this gets as easily confused as Mitchell: CHRIS KANYON IS THE FIRST EVER OPENLY GAY ACTIVE PRO ATHLETE IN THE FIVE MAJOR MALE US SPORTS OF PRO BASEBALL, BASKETBALL, WRESTLING, FOOTBALL OR HOCKEY. Now, the question is this: Am I, Chris Klucsarits, the person behind the pro wrestling character known as Kanyon, the person who wrestles as Kanyon, am I also homosexual? Is the Kanyon character partially autobiographical, a complete mirror image of Chris Klucsarits, or a total work of fiction? I really don't know how I could have been any more clear without revealing Chris Klucsarits' sexuality, although, if you read all the blogs, that was part of the point: to not reveal Chris Klucsarits' sexuality to raise the question of does Chris Klucsarits' sexuality matter and is it anyone's business? Otherwise, I was very clear in separating the character of the wrestler Chris Kanyon from the person who portrays that character, Chris Klucsarits. How did he possibly get so confused? Could he really be that simple?
I think you skipped an option: "Hey, have you seen that movie Brokeback Mountain? You gotta check it out. It's really good! And, it is ground breaking, because not only is it good, but it is about a gay love story."
-or-
"Hey, have you seen that new player on our team? You gotta check him out. He can really play!! And, not only is he good, but he is the first openly gay active pro baseball player in the country"
Etc.
You see, yeah, Brokeback Mountain is a good movie. But if the main characters were a male and a female, I believe it would not be getting all the attention it is getting. It definitely would not be the subject of so many jokes. It would just be another good movie and certainly would not be recommended by so many. But, because of the homosexual subject matter and the groundbreaking way with which it is covered, it is news. If someone said, check out this movie, or this singer, or this wrestler, or this baseball player, they are pretty good, I am not sure that that would be enough to peak my interest. But if they are first at something, or groundbreaking in some way, or trying to raise important sociological and psychological questions thru their performance, than I would be more apt to check them out. If my initial Blog was "Is Kanyon Good," I wonder how many articles would have been written about me? I wonder how many Myspace profile and blog views and how many friend requests I would have had? To give you an idea, prior to the Blog, "Is Kanyon Gay", in the 7 Months my Myspace was up, I had about 11,700 profile views and 1805 friend requests. . In the 2 weeks since I put it up, I have had about an additional 8100 profile views, 1500 friend requests, and almost 30,000 blog views. That comes out to about 56 vs. 506 profile views per day, 8.6 vs. 92.1 friend requests per day and 1875 blog views per day. So, in closing, based on the numbers above, let me say that apparently
people are interested to see how this plays out. People are interested
in this new aspect of my character and to see how much of the character
is autobiographical. If you don't think they are, check out the comments
on my Myspace, or if you want, I can show you some of the e-mails I received.
I have inspired people. I have helped people. I know what I am doing is
good and that I am being honest and that I am doing what I am doing for
the right reasons. Now I wonder. Can you honestly say the same things
about that article you wrote about me? Honestly? Do you even know how
to be honest? I wonder. Chris "Kanyon" Klucsarits ChrisKanyon.net courtesy http://www.chriskanyon.net/
|
|||||||||||
| When using any of this information give proper credit to Cactusb and the Wrestling Clothesline at http://www.wrestlingclothesline.com Questions? Comments? Results? Wrestling Related items? Send them to us here. If we use them on the page you will be given full credit for supplying us with it!
|
|||||||||||
|
©
2004 Brett Schwan
|
|||||||||||